Naar de inhoud
Use cases
Permanent crops

Vineyards

Steep ground, tight rows, high value

Vigour mapping by row, downy and powdery mildew surveillance, frost pockets, and the terrain where drone application is actually permitted.

Parcels of 0.5 to 20 hectares, including slopes machinery cannot work.

Book a field visit
Aerial view of vineyard rows following a slope

What actually goes wrong

A vineyard is the same plants for thirty years, which makes every uneven patch a compounding problem rather than a one-season one. Vigour varies row by row and often vine by vine. Mildew pressure builds inside a canopy that nobody can see into from outside. And on steep sites the machinery that can legally treat the crop is limited by the slope itself, which is precisely the terrain where the EU permits aerial application by exemption.

How we set it up

Row-resolution vigour mapping that reports per row and per panel, not per block average. Disease surveillance timed to the infection periods rather than a calendar. Frost profiling across the site through spring, because cold air pooling in a vineyard is repeatable and therefore predictable. On steep parcels where the exemption applies, application follows the same maps.

The flight calendar across a season

  1. Frost pocket profiling and the overnight risk brief on clear nights.

  2. Vigour mapping by row for canopy management and pruning decisions.

  3. Mildew surveillance timed to infection periods.

  4. Water status by thermal imaging and the harvest sequencing map.

  5. Missing and declining vine census for replanting.

What you end up with

Recorded on your fields, flight by flight. Not a projection.

  • Vigour reported per row and per panel, not as a block average
  • Mildew surveillance tied to infection periods with dated evidence
  • Cold pockets named before dusk rather than diagnosed after sunrise
  • Harvest sequencing built from measured ripeness variation

More in Permanent crops